National Council on Disability
Sexual Assault of Students with Disabilities on College Campuses
Notice of Funding Opportunity
July 8, 2016 – Announcement of Funding Opportunity for a Cooperative Agreement
Authority: Section 401, Title IV of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
Full Proposal Deadline: Due by 5:00 p.m. (submitter’s local time), August 5, 2016
Late applications will not be considered.
Deliver hard-copy materials to:
National Council on Disability
1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850
Washington, DC 20004
ATTN: Ana Torres-Davis
Maximum amount available for this project: $42,000
All potential applicants are eligible to apply
Cost sharing is not required
The estimated period of performance is 12 months
The National Council on Disability (NCD) seeks proposals for a report which examines sexual assault of students with disabilities on college campuses. The findings in this report primarily serve to assist policymakers, including the White House and Congress, with insight needed to make policy decisions to improve outcomes for students that have experienced sexual assault on campus. The report will also provide students who have experienced sexual assault with an understanding of policy, legislation, and initiatives that impact their lives.
The report will examine the prevalence of sexual assault on students with disabilities on campus and if the prevalence of sexual assault of students with disabilities is found to be at a higher ratio than students without disabilities, examine the reasons why, and what policies/laws can be instituted to prevent and/or reduce the prevalence of such assaults. It will also examine and assess campus policies and procedures regarding sexual assault – from reporting to post-assault services and campus adjudication - and how victims with disabilities fare within those structures, and make recommendations for reform. The report should support the proposition that college policies, services and supports for victims of sexual assault are crucial to the academic success and retention of students with disabilities. Thus, this research will examine policy, physical, and programmatic barriers preventing students with disabilities from accessing services, as well as gaps and weaknesses in services. The report will also identify promising practices and emerging trends in campus policies and services that are effective in addressing the needs of students with disabilities that have experienced sexual assault on campus, and determine what policy changes are needed so that students with disabilities fully benefit from victim services in the college setting.
Ana Torres-Davis, Attorney Advisor, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 272-2019, e-mail: email@example.com.
Anticipated Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement
Estimated Number of Awards: 1
Anticipated Funding Amount: $42,000
The funding amount is contingent on fiscal year 2016 funding availability.
Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
Hard-copy and email proposals must be submitted by 5 p.m. (submitter's local time), August 5 2016.
Proposal Review Information
Review Criteria: National Council on Disability approved criteria. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Award Administration Information
Award Conditions: Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Reporting Requirements: Additional reporting requirements apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Background and Issues
The White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault released their first report in April 2014, leading with a chilling statistic: one in five college students experiences sexual assault during their college career. The ACLU estimates that 95% of U.S. campus rapes go unreported, partially due to different social stigmas experienced by victims. The Center for Public Integrity found that students who committed sexual assaults on campus often face little or no punishment from school judicial systems — even in cases involving alleged repeat offenders.
Sexual assault takes an immeasurable toll on the victim’s physical and mental health. The emotional and physical scars of an assault can deeply impact a student’s ability to cope with academic, social, and personal responsibilities and the problem of under-reporting reflects an extreme need for increased campus prevention and support systems.
Students with disabilities are particularly vulnerable to sexual assault. Tragically, 83% of women with disabilities (of any kind) will be sexually assaulted in their lifetime (Stimpson & Best, 1991). Studies show that any type of disability contributes to higher risk of sexual victimization, and the U.S. Department of Justice reports that persons with a disability have an age-adjusted rate of rape or sexual assault that is more than twice the rate for persons without a disability. In particular, intellectual disability, communication disorders, and behavioral disorders appear to contribute to very high levels of risk, and having multiple disabilities result in even higher risk levels (Sullivan & Knutson, 2000). Eighty percent of women and 30% of men with intellectual disabilities have been sexually assaulted. 50% of those women have been assaulted more than 10 times (Sobsey & Doe, 1991; Sorenson, 2000). Only 3% of sexual abuse cases involving people with developmental disabilities are ever reported (Valenti-Hein and Schwartz, 1995).
Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to raise awareness of sexual assault against students with disabilities on college campuses by examining (a) the extent of sexual assaults on students with disabilities on campus, (b) college policies and practices that respond to victims with disabilities who have been victims of sexual assault, (c) college policies and practices aimed at educating students on sexual assault prevention, (e) the availability of victims services on campus that are physically and programmatically accessible to students with disabilities who are victims of sexual assault, and to provide recommendations for reform.
Research Questions and Scope of Work
This project will seek to address core questions among the following:
What is the current landscape of college policies and programs regarding sexual assault prevention and response?
What gaps, weaknesses, and discriminatory policies exist in these services?
What are current promising and best practices and emerging trends? Such as healthy sexual-relationship training for incoming freshmen, bystander-awareness training to teach students to step in to stop sexual assault, climate surveys and changes in college-disciplinary-board rules.
What can be done to enhance the prevention of sexual assault on campus?
What policy and system reforms are needed in postsecondary settings?
What is the federal and state legislative response to campus sexual violence?
The research will explore the following:
Have college staff and faculty received adequate training to identify and provide support for students with disabilities who have experienced sexual assault?
Are college faculty and staff educated on sexual assault issues/statistics in regard to students with disabilities?
What are the common barriers that curb reporting by assault victims with disabilities? What are colleges doing to remove those barriers?
Do colleges address a broad range of sexual misconduct, not just forcible rape?
Are college’s policies compliant with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, the Clery Act, and Title IX?
Do colleges have trauma services available for assault victims with disabilities that are physically and programmatically accessible to students with physical, developmental and sensory disabilities?
Do they maintain relationships with trauma and mental health providers in the community that provide similarly accessible?
What training has campus law enforcement received in disability awareness and in taking reports from victims/witnesses with disabilities? Are interpreters or other disability-related supports readily available?
Do colleges attempt to reduce stigma by, e.g., locating trauma and victim services in an area that respects the privacy of students?
How are ID/DD serving college programs (like Think college schools) engaging with campus administration and their students to ensure the safety of these students?
How are Disabled Student Unions connected to sexual assault survivor groups on campus? And how are Disability Student Services connected to mental health services to ensure students with disabilities who are victimized are getting the ongoing services they need? (Therapy, accommodations, etc.)
The report will incorporate findings and conclusions drawn from the examination and include specific recommendations regarding improvement.
The deliverables for this project will include:
A detailed preliminary framing paper and outline.
A revised detailed framing paper and outline.
An initial draft of the report incorporating the findings, conclusions, and recommendations that can be drawn from the examination.
A second draft of the report which will incorporate the findings, conclusions, and recommendations that can be drawn from the examination and incorporating recommended revisions derived from NCD staff, Council members, and external peer reviews.
A final report that incorporates recommended revisions derived from NCD staff, Council members, and external peer reviews.
A 2-3 page “Report Highlights” document, which succinctly and in plain language encapsulates the report series’ scope and purpose, major findings, and recommendations, and contains a link to the full report at the bottom.
The final report must document the methodology, findings, and recommendations and must include a separate section containing the recommendations, organized according to the entity to which they are directed. All assertions of fact must be substantiated in endnotes, and presented in the format of the Chicago Style Manual.
Any methodology used to obtain stakeholder input must allow for open-ended discussions between stakeholders, as opposed to soliciting answers to specific, predetermined questions. While the use of data from existing surveys is permitted, conducting surveys for purposes of this study is strongly discouraged. The inclusion of people with disabilities must be integral to the planning, development, and execution of this project. The report should also reflect NCD’s view that the disability community is heterogeneous, with diverse needs and perspectives, and those perspectives should be included.
All potential applicants are eligible to apply.
Cost-sharing is not required.
Other Eligibility Criteria: Proposals that merely offer to conduct a project in accordance with the requirements of the Government’s scope of work will not be eligible for award. You must submit an explanation of the proposed technical approach in conjunction with the tasks to be performed in achieving the project objectives.
Proposals that do not comply with NCD’s Document Access Requirements, as specified below, will not be considered for award.
NCD expects to make 1 award with an anticipated funding amount of $42,000.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Full hard-copy and email proposals must be submitted by 5 p.m. (submitter’s local time), August 5, 2016.
The proposal must be prepared in two parts: A 'Technical Proposal' and a 'Business Proposal. Each of the parts shall be separate and complete in itself so that evaluation of one may be accomplished independently of evaluation of the other. The technical proposal must not contain reference to cost; however, resource information, such as data concerning labor hours and categories, materials, subcontracts, etc., must be contained in the technical proposal so that your understanding of the scope of the work may be evaluated. It must disclose your technical approach in sufficient detail to provide a clear and concise presentation that includes, but is not limited to, the requirements of the technical proposal instructions.
The proposal must be signed by an official authorized to bind your organization.
You must submit an original and 1 copy of your technical proposal and an original and 1 copy of your business proposal, including an e-mailed/electronic Word file copy of the technical and business proposal to:
National Council on Disability
1331 F Street, N.W., Suite 850
Washington, DC 20004-1107
You may, at your discretion, submit alternate proposals, or proposals which deviate from the requirements; PROVIDED, that you also submit a proposal for performance of the work, as specified in the statement of work. These proposals may be considered if overall performance would be improved or not compromised and if they are in the best interest of the Government. Alternate proposals, or deviations from any requirements of this funding opportunity, must be clearly identified.
The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this request for proposals.
It is understood that your proposal will become part of the official cooperative agreement file.
This solicitation does not commit the government to contract for any work or services whatsoever. Respondents are advised that the United States (US.) Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this solicitation notice. All costs associated with responding to this solicitation notice will be solely at the responding party’s expense. It is the responsibility of the interested parties to monitor grants.gov and ncd.gov sites for additional information.
A detailed work plan must be submitted indicating how each aspect of the statement of work is to be accomplished. Your technical approach should be in as much detail as you consider necessary to fully explain your proposed technical approach or method. The technical proposal should reflect a clear understanding of the nature of the work being undertaken.
The technical proposal must include information on how the project is to be organized, staffed, and managed. Information should be provided which will demonstrate your understanding and management of important events or tasks. You must explain how the management and coordination of consultant and/or subcontractor efforts will be accomplished.
The technical proposal must include a list of names and proposed duties of the professional personnel, consultants, and key subcontractor employees assigned to the project. Their resumes should be included and should contain information on education, background, recent experience, and specific requirement related or technical accomplishments. The approximate percentage of time each individual will be available for this project must be included. The proposed staff hours for each of the above individuals should be allocated against each task or subtask for the project.
The technical proposal must provide the general background, experience, and qualifications of the organization. Similar or related contracts, subcontracts, or grants should be included and contain the name of the customer, contract or grant number, dollar amount, time of performance, and the names and telephone numbers of the contracting officer’s technical representative or project officer and contracting/grants officer.
The technical proposal must contain a discussion of present or proposed facilities and equipment which will be used in the performance of the contract.
The technical proposal must be prepared and submitted in the following format:
1. Abstract (no more than 2 pages)
A two-page summary shall be provided abstracting the proposal contents (e.g., objectives, activities, expected outcomes) in language understandable to an informed layperson. The narrative should be limited to no more than 250 words.
2. Table of Contents
3. Introduction (no more than 20 pages)
Offerors shall summarize, in their own words, the purposes and objectives of the project to demonstrate their complete understanding of NCD’s intent and requirements. This section also should contain a specific statement of any interpretations, questions, qualifications, limitations, deviations, or exceptions to the Solicitation's scope of work and the extent to which the offeror’s proposal can be expected to meet the requirements set forth in the scope of work.
4. Procedural Plan (no more than 40 pages)
This section shall fully describe the theoretical and technical approaches the offeror will employ in complying with each task in the scope of work. While a general statement of strategy is appropriate, the offeror shall be specific in describing the manner in which the overall review will be conducted, and the intended approach to the design.
5. Management Plan and Schedule (no more than 15 pages)
The management plan shall show the feasibility of implementing the offeror’s resources. The offeror shall present a time chart that specifies the amount of time (in person days) each staff member will commit to implementing each task. The plan shall present a clear description of the working relationships among personnel. Finally, the plan shall contain a method for insuring the timely and successful completion of each work task.
Personnel with major responsibilities shall be listed by name, title, position, academic background, relevant experience, responsibilities with the project, and the extent to which this commitment is assured. This section should include specific time commitments of staff to other projects, both Federal and non-Federal. Consultants who have agreed to serve on the project should be similarly identified and assurances of their commitment included. The Project Director shall be committed for no less than approximately 60 percent of the contract. Vitae for all principal personnel, including consultants, should be appended to the proposal. Each curriculum vitae should be limited to not more than two (2) pages and should emphasize areas of experience directly relevant to this work statement.
7. Organization Experience
This section shall describe the offeror’s pertinent experience and qualification in conducting work of a similar nature. Offerors shall offer evidence of not more than 5 previous related assignments, including the names and telephone numbers of client project offices who would be able to comment on the offeror’s performance of those assignments. Summaries (not to exceed one page) of related work shall be included. References to products resulting from these related activities shall also be included.
This section shall identify those resources (other than personnel), facilities, and equipment (e.g., library holdings, computer hardware, and software) available for use in conducting this project. Offeror should address accessibility for persons with disabilities.
9. Current Contractual Obligations
Each offeror will be required to outline both Federal and non-Federal contractual obligations existing during the course of his award for all projects involving personnel who will be assigned to this project. Such organizations/agencies must be identified by name and the percentage of work time allotted to these projects by personnel committed to the proposed project must be provided.
10. Issues and Associated Data Items
When responding to the Tasks, when identifying what should receive emphasis, careful consideration should be given to the issues identified, their associated data items, and the statement of products desired in the Final Report.
All information provided by NCD must be returned to NCD upon completion of the analysis and no later than 10 working days after the completion of the contract. The information may not be reproduced or released without the prior written permission of NCD.
11. Rights in Data, Copyright, and Disclosure
a. Data – The term data as used here includes written reports (progress, draft, and final), electronic format and work of any similar nature that is required under any resulting Cooperative Agreement to perform this project. It does not include the contractor’s financial reports, or other information incidental to contractor administration. Data submitted to and accepted by the NCD under the cooperative agreement shall be the property of the NCD, and NCD shall have full and unlimited rights to use such data for any purpose in whatever manner deemed desirable and appropriate, including making it available to the general public. Such use shall be without any additional payment to the contractor. Data may be published as the property of NCD without giving authorship to the contractor.
b. Copyright – The contractor relinquishes any and all copyrights and/or privileges developed under any Cooperative Agreement. The contractor shall not include in the data any copyrightable matter without the written approval of NCD, unless the contractor provides the NCD with the written permission of the copyright owner for the NCD to use the matter.
c. Disclosure – The contractor agrees not to divulge or release any information, reports or recommendations developed or obtained in connection with the performance of any Cooperative Agreement with NCD, and not otherwise available to the public, without the prior approval of the NCD.
d. Final approval of deliverables
All final deliverables are the product of NCD and require acceptance and approval by NCD. NCD reserves the right to make substantive edits to any final deliverables.
12. Award Information
The Government will make award to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government, cost or price and other factors considered. For this solicitation, technical quality is more important than cost or price. As proposals become more equal in their technical merit, the evaluated cost or price becomes more important. As the technical merit and the evaluated cost or price become essentially equal, other factors may become a determining factor.
Upon notification of intent to award, the Contractor will be expected to:
Develop and submit a timeline and deliverables schedule that will be used to guide the conduct of the study and monitor the work;
Develop and submit a payment schedule chart to be used for installment payments of the award;
Meet with select NCD staff and board members at a pre and post award meeting.
Throughout the project, the Contractor and Contract Officer will conduct mutually agreed upon monthly teleconference calls and/or biweekly meetings, set-up and arranged for by the Contractor, to include other project staff members, NCD staff and, as appropriate, selected project advisors and NCD board members. The Contractor will also provide monthly electronic progress reports to the NCD contractor Officer. The contractor will also present to the full Council at a quarterly Council meeting and should factor the travel expenses into the project budget.
The business proposal shall contain a detailed budget for the project and the certifications and representations required by OMB Circular A-110.
Note: For each type of entity, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles applicable to the entity incurring the costs. Thus, allowable costs incurred by State, local or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A–87, “Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.” The allowable of costs incurred by non-profit organizations is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A–122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations.”
The allowable costs incurred by institutions of higher education is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A–21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” The allowable costs incurred by hospitals is determined in accordance with the provisions of appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.” The allowable costs incurred by commercial organizations and those non-profit organizations listed in Attachment C to Circular A–122 is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 31.
Technical Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation criteria will score proposals with a maximum of 100 points, divided as follows:
1. A clear understanding of the nature of the work (20 points)
The proposal presents a clear understanding of the tasks required and the importance, quality and reliability of those tasks. The proposal will present the rationale/interpretation of the project approach.
2. Procedural Plan (30 points)
The proposal contains evidence of a fully described technical approach to comply with each of the tasks in the scope of work. The proposal is consistent with the goals, objectives, compliance requirements, and is practical in terms of producing needed information, analysis and recommendations.
3. Management Plan and Schedule (20 points)
The degree to which the project team, including any use of consultants, is organized, managed, and motivated to accomplish effective and efficient implementation of all tasks to be completed. The proposal budget is appropriate to the administration of the project. The time frame is realistic. Plans and schedules to assure smooth cooperation with the NCD staff involved are evident. The proposal clearly identifies who will be key personnel and includes a table showing the number of person-days by tasks for each of the key personnel.
4. Personnel (15 points)
The proposal provides evidence of the specific qualifications and skills of staff and consultants to be assigned to this project, and their experience and familiarity with the topic, including relevant laws, regulations, procedures and practices in the Federal Government. Skills in writing, and conducting research should also clearly demonstrated.
5. Organizational Experience (15 points)
The degree to which the overall experience and past performance of the offeror in executing similar projects should be described. Evidence of related assignments should be detailed. Offeror shall present evidence of related assignments, including the names and telephone numbers of previous project officers who would be able to comment on the offeror’s performance of those assignments.
Project Start Date
The projected start of the cooperative agreement is August 29, 2016. The projected first complete draft of the report is due to NCD by June 27, 2017. The projected final draft of the report is due to NCD by August 28, 2017.
Furthermore, the vendor will be expected to arrange and conduct monthly teleconference calls with NCD staff and board members, will provide monthly progress reports to NCD staff, and will also be expected to meet with select NCD staff and Board Members upon the awarding of the contract. The vendor is also responsible for reasonable accommodations at any meetings, events, forums, focus groups, etc. (i.e. sign language interpreters, CART reporters, and other such providers, as well as documents or other materials that are made available in public forums), associated with this agreement.
The contractor will also present to the full Council at a quarterly Council meeting and should factor the travel expenses into the project budget.
Finally, the vendor is expected to develop and submit a “timeline and deliverables and payment schedule” chart which will be used to guide the conduct of the research.
NCD reports must be totally accessible to all people with disabilities at all iterative stages of its drafting and editing. All graphs and charts must have full text descriptions embedded as alt-text and ensure that it is Section 508 compliant. If you are drafting a report or paper for NCD, you must submit your drafts and final version in an electronic Word and PDF format. You must adhere to NCD's formatting and style standards. Details regarding NCD’s additional formatting and style standards follow below. The final document must be professionally edited before submission.
Citations & Style Guide
NCD utilizes the Chicago Style Manual for its reports and papers and employs the documentary note system of citation (otherwise known as notes and bibliography). An explanation of this style of citation can be found at: http://library.williams.edu/citing/styles/chicago1.php and http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html.
NCD reports must be totally accessible to all people with disabilities at all iterative stages of its drafting and editing. All graphs and charts must have full text descriptions embedded as alt-text and ensure that it is Section 508 compliant. If you are drafting a report or paper for NCD, you must submit your drafts and final version in an electronic Word and PDF format.
Text and covers should be created and printed with the highest contrast possible. This includes text in all graphics, figures, tables, and charts.
Use Arial, 12-point. Italics should be used sparingly, not for full sentences or paragraphs or recommendations. Do not use small caps.
The body of the report or paper should be spaced with 1.5 line spacing.
The Letter of Transmittal, references, endnotes, appendices, etc. should be single spaced.
Set paper size to 8.5" x 11".
Set standard one inch (1") margins on all sides.
Use block style. Begin paragraphs without tabbing in. Text should be in single column format. Use a double space between paragraphs.
Use left justified (ragged right).
Smart Quotes and Apostrophes
Use smart quotes and apostrophes.
Chapters should start on odd-numbered pages, which fall on the right side.
Headers and Footers
Delete unnecessary headers and footers.
Widows and Orphans
Do not have widows or orphans.
Make all Web addresses hyperlinks.
Utilize Microsoft Word default style for headers (and sub-headers) so that readers can easily track the progression of the report or paper and so that the report or paper can be made easily navigable with a table of contents.
Do not use caps or small caps in the headers. Double space between headers and text.
Spacing after Periods
Use one space after a period at the end of a sentence and one space after colons and question marks.
All documents use endnotes in Arial. 12-point font and single spaced.
Page numbering will be centered at the bottom of each page. Blank pages require page numbers. Begin ordinal page numbering on the Letter of Transmittal page, which is always page 1 (suppress page number of that page). All pages are numbered consecutively from 1-999 including appendices. Do not use roman numbering or alpha/numeric numbering in any parts of the document, including appendices.
Create a table of contents (TOC) using Microsoft Office Word’s TOC feature. This includes page numbers for chapters and major section headings. Type all text in regular font. Do not bold entire page.
NCD Editorial Style Requirements
Use active voice (within reason)
Numbers: one-nine, 10 and above
As a general default, use people first language throughout, including but not limited to:
- “people with disabilities” [[not “persons” or “individuals with disabilities”]]
- “people without disabilities,” [[not disabled, handicapped, impaired, or nondisabled]]
- “people with [particular disability] or “a person with a disability, including, but not limited to:
- “people with intellectual disabilities” [[not intellectually disabled]]
- “people with mental illnesses” [[not people who are mentally ill]]
- “people with physical disabilities” [[not the mobility impaired]]
- “people with learning disabilities” [[not the learning disabled]]
- “people with a mental illnesses” [[not mentally ill people]]
Use current acceptable terminology including, but not limited to:
- “intellectual disability” [[not mental retardation or MR]]
- “seniors” or “people who are aging” [[not the elderly or the aged]]
- “youth” or “young people with disabilities” [[not disabled youth, etc.]]
Use terminology preferred by particular disability subpopulations:
- “Deaf and Hard of Hearing” as a noun, with capitalization [[not people who are deaf and hard of hearing]]
- “autistic” as an adjective or a noun [[not people who have autism]]
- “little people” or “little person” [[not dwarf / dwarves]]
NCD has determined that the terminology used in its 2000 report, “People Labeled with Psychiatric Disabilities,” best captures the identity and experiences of the population (also called people with mental illnesses,” “mental health consumers,” “psychiatric survivors,” and a number of other terms). However, because the field uses such a wide diversity of terms, including terms used by people with psychiatric disabilities themselves, NCD documents (papers, reports, and so forth) can include a variety of terminology used by people quoted herein. The exceptions are the need to edit and remove terms considered detrimental to the community, NCD’s mission, and ensuring the use of “people first” language.
Use [a bracket] to show language revisions/edits (including where the changes were made within otherwise quoted material) in order to meet NCD’s requirements identified in this document
Use “people from diverse cultures,” “people from diverse racial background,” “people of color” and so forth [[not minorities or minority groups]]
When referring to people who have been consistently or historically overlooked, segregated, disregarded, or simply not included, please consider use of generic terms like “marginalized” or “under-served.”
1990s (not 1990’s)
Punctuation NEVER comes after a closing quotation mark or an endnote/footnote number.
Due to or Because of? “Due to” modifies nouns and is generally used after some form of the verb to be (is, are, was, were, etc.). Jan's success is due to talent and spunk (“due to” modifies success). “Because of” should modify verbs. Ted resigned because of poor health (“because of” modifies resigned).
Generally, use “between” for two, and “among” for three or more.
Legal Cases/Bills/Laws, etc.:
Italicize names of court cases
Get rid of small caps used in notes
Congress, not the Congress
data indicates (treat data as singular)
Department (capped referring to a U.S. Department)
health care (n, um*)
home- and community-based (um)
interagency (closed up)
multi (close up)
National Council on Disability [[not Disabilities]]
NCD, not the NCD
non (close up)
percent, not %, unless in tables or parentheses
Supreme Court, the Court
Use population group names from current Census Bureau listing.
In titles, cap prepositions of 5 or more letters.
*um=unit modifier, meaning two words used as an adjective
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
Reviews of proposals submitted to NCD are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed project. These reviewers are selected by NCD staff charged with the oversight of the review process. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NCD who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The NCD staff assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents.
Notice of Award
NCD will notify the applicant by telephone, e-mail, and/or letter. This notification will begin negotiations for a Cooperative Agreement. The letter is not authorization to begin performance. Notification of the award will be made to the submitting organization by Ana Torres-Davis, an NCD Attorney Advisor. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible. Verbatim copies of reviews, not included identifying names or information about proposal reviewers, will be made available upon request.
ABOUT THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY
Overview and Purpose
The National Council on Disability (NCD) is an independent federal agency comprised of a team of Presidential and Congressional appointees, an Executive Director appointed by the Chair, and a full-time professional staff. The purpose of NCD is to promote policies, programs, practices, and procedures that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with disabilities regardless of the nature or significance of the disability and to empower people with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society.
The current statutory mandate of NCD includes the following:
Reviewing and evaluating, on a continuing basis, policies, programs, practices, and procedures concerning individuals with disabilities conducted or assisted by federal departments and agencies, including programs established or assisted under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, or under the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, as well as all statutes and regulations pertaining to federal programs that assist such individuals with disabilities, to assess the effectiveness of such policies, programs, practices, procedures, statutes, and regulations in meeting the needs of individuals with disabilities.
Reviewing and evaluating, on a continuing basis, new and emerging disability policy issues affecting individuals with disabilities in the Federal Government, at the state and local government levels, and in the private sector, including the need for and coordination of adult services, access to personal assistance services, school reform efforts and the impact of such efforts on individuals with disabilities, access to health care, and policies that act as disincentives for individuals to seek and retain employment.
Making recommendations to the President, Congress, the Secretary of Education, the director of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and other officials of federal agencies about ways to better promote equal opportunity, economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society for Americans with disabilities.
Providing Congress, on a continuing basis, with advice, recommendations, legislative proposals, and any additional information that NCD or Congress deems appropriate.
Gathering information about the implementation, effectiveness, and impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.).
Advising the President, Congress, the commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration, the assistant secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services within the Department of Education, and the director of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research on the development of the programs to be carried out under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
Providing advice to the commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration with respect to the policies and conduct of the administration.
Making recommendations to the director of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research on ways to improve research, service, administration, and the collection, dissemination, and implementation of research findings affecting people with disabilities.
Providing advice regarding priorities for the activities of the Interagency Disability Coordinating Council and reviewing the recommendations of this council for legislative and administrative changes to ensure that such recommendations are consistent with NCD’s purpose of promoting the full integration, independence, and productivity of individuals with disabilities.
Preparing and submitting to the President and Congress an annual report titled National Disability Policy: A Progress Report.
In 1995, NCD was designated by the Department of State to be the U.S. government’s official contact point for disability issues. Specifically, NCD interacts with the special rapporteur of the United Nations Commission for Social Development on disability matters.
Consumers Served and Current Activities
Although many government agencies deal with issues and programs affecting people with disabilities, NCD is the only federal agency charged with addressing, analyzing, and making recommendations on issues of public policy that affect people with disabilities regardless of age, disability type, perceived employment potential, economic need, specific functional ability, veteran status, or other individual circumstance. NCD recognizes its unique opportunity to facilitate independent living, community integration, and employment opportunities for people with disabilities by ensuring an informed and coordinated approach to addressing the concerns of people with disabilities and eliminating barriers to their active participation in community and family life.
NCD plays a major role in developing disability policy in America. In fact, NCD originally proposed what eventually became the ADA. NCD’s present list of key issues includes improving personal assistance services, promoting health care reform, including students with disabilities in high-quality programs in typical neighborhood schools, promoting equal employment and community housing opportunities, monitoring the implementation of the ADA, improving assistive technology, and ensuring that people with disabilities who are members of diverse cultures fully participate in society.
NCD was established in 1978 as an advisory board within the Department of Education (P.L. 95-602). The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1984 (P.L. 98-221) transformed NCD into an independent agency.
National Council on Disability
1331 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
For General Information: